A New World Order:
The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are often seen as a benevolent roadmap for global development. However, a deeper examination reveals connections to a more controversial agenda, rooted in the philosophies of Theosophy and the teachings of Helena Blavatsky and Alice Bailey.
Origins and Theosophical Influence:
Theosophy, founded by Helena Blavatsky, and later promoted by Alice Bailey, emphasizes a new world order and spiritual hierarchy. Bailey’s Lucis Trust, originally named Lucifer Publishing, has historical ties to the United Nations, raising questions about the philosophical underpinnings of the SDGs. Bailey’s works often mentioned a “Plan” for humanity’s spiritual evolution, aligning with the concept of a centralized world government.
William Cooper and David Icke:
Researchers like William Cooper and David Icke have drawn attention to these connections. Cooper, in his radio show and presentations, highlighted the influence of Theosophical ideas on the United Nations. Icke’s extensive work on global conspiracies often references the role of organizations like the UN in promoting a covert agenda for global control.
Build Back Better and Agenda 21:
The “Build Back Better” initiative and Agenda 21 are seen as branches of this overarching agenda. Both emphasize sustainability but are critiqued for pushing towards centralized control and eroding national sovereignty. These initiatives are viewed as steps towards a fascist-communist world government, blending corporate and state power in a way that limits individual freedoms.
The Sustainable Development Goals:
- No Poverty: Centralized economic control could restrict individual financial freedom.
- Zero Hunger: Regulations on food production and distribution could increase dependency on government.
- Good Health and Well-being: Potential for mandatory health measures and digital health IDs.
- Quality Education: Centralized curriculum control could limit intellectual freedom.
- Gender Equality: Could be used to enforce social engineering.
- Clean Water and Sanitation: Control over water resources.
- Affordable and Clean Energy: Energy policies could restrict personal choices.
- Decent Work and Economic Growth: Centralized job allocation.
- Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure: Increased surveillance and digital control.
- Reduced Inequality: Redistribution of wealth could undermine property rights.
- Sustainable Cities and Communities: Smart cities could lead to constant surveillance.
- Responsible Consumption and Production: Potential restrictions on personal consumption.
- Climate Action: Could justify extensive government control.
- Life Below Water: Ocean resources control.
- Life on Land: Land use regulations.
- Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions: Expansion of global governance.
- Partnerships for the Goals: Global alliances that can undermine national sovereignty.
Conclusion:
While the Sustainable Development Goals appear progressive, their roots and connections suggest a deeper, more controlling agenda. Understanding these origins and influences is crucial for those who seek to question and critically evaluate global policies. These goals could endanger individual freedoms through increased government control and digital surveillance.
Join the Unmatrix Tribe to explore more about these controversial topics and how to navigate the complexities of modern global agendas. Register here.
