Understanding the Risk of Frozen Assets in Cryptocurrency
One of the significant risks associated with cryptocurrency is the potential for your assets to be frozen. Here are some notable examples:
- Three Arrows Capital (3AC):
The founders of 3AC saw more than $1 billion of their assets frozen by a British Virgin Islands court amid the hedge fund’s collapse. This highlights how, despite the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, court orders can still impact the accessibility of assets. - Voyager Bankruptcy:
Customers of the cryptocurrency exchange Voyager found their assets frozen following the company’s bankruptcy filing. This incident raised significant concerns about the security and reliability of crypto platforms in protecting user assets. - JPEX Scandal in Hong Kong:
In one of the largest alleged financial fraud cases in Hong Kong, the assets worth approximately HK$228 million were frozen, affecting numerous investors involved with the unlicensed cryptocurrency trading platform JPEX.
These examples demonstrate that cryptocurrencies are not immune to legal actions and regulatory interventions, challenging the perception of absolute security and anonymity.
Questioning the Security and Origins of Cryptocurrency
The security of cryptocurrencies hinges on encryption and the blockchain, but recent events suggest vulnerabilities:
- Encryption Doubts:
Despite the strong encryption protocols, incidents of frozen assets question the impenetrability of cryptocurrency security. Legal and regulatory bodies can intervene, casting doubt on how “untouchable” these assets truly are. - Origins Controversy:
Rumors circulate about the origins of cryptocurrencies. Some theories suggest that Elon Musk could be behind Bitcoin, while others propose that China or Russia might have a hand in developing cryptocurrencies to control global finance. These speculations feed into broader concerns about cryptocurrencies aligning with new world order ideals—where digital currencies, unbacked by physical assets, facilitate unprecedented control over individual finances.
Aligning with the New World Order Ideals
Cryptocurrencies fit seamlessly into the vision of a cashless society, often highlighted by new world order theories. The push towards digital currencies can be seen as part of a larger agenda to centralize and monitor financial transactions, making every move traceable.
Unmatrix’s Perspective: Backing Currency with Solid Assets
At Unmatrix, we believe that any currency should be backed by solid assets such as precious metals or crystals and gemstones. This is the only way to ensure that money serves as actual credit and not debt notes, as current money bills do. Backing currency with tangible assets provides stability and intrinsic value, making it a more reliable and trustworthy medium of exchange.
Stay connected with Unmatrix for more insights and guidance on navigating the digital and spiritual realms. Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Instagram and YouTube for daily inspiration and updates. Welcome to the Unmatrix Tribe!
